July 6th, 2026
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to follow and signup for notifications!
The U.S. Supreme Court has granted Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) petitions for a writ of certiorari, in legal actions challenging state/local laws restricting “assault weapons”. In two notable cases — Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins — the Supreme Court has determined to consider SAF’s challenges to the bans on so-called “assault weapons” in Illinois and Connecticut.
Originally filed in 2021, Viramontes challenges the Cook County (Illinois) ban on many popular, commonly-owned modern guns, which was the precursor for the nearly identical statewide ban passed by the Illinois legislature.
In Grant v. Higgins, SAF challenges Connecticut’s broad ban on common, mag-fed, semi-automatic rifles — both by name and by feature set. After a troubling and misguided preliminary injunction decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, SAF presented the case to the Supreme Court for consideration.
“The Supreme Court’s decision to hear these pivotal cases will finally provide the courts the necessary guidance as it relates to the types of arms protected by the Second Amendment,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “The modern semi-automatic rifles banned in Cook County, Connecticut and elsewhere are among the most commonly owned firearms in the country, placing them well within the scope of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment protects arms in common use for lawful purposes, and it’s hard to argue that a type of rifle that potentially outnumbers Ford F-150 trucks in America doesn’t meet that standard.”
SAF is joined in Viramontes v. Cook County by the Firearms Policy Coalition and two private citizens, and is joined in Grant v. Higgins by the Connecticut Citizens Defense League and three private citizens.
Similar Posts:
Tags: Certiorari Gun Case, Connecticut Gun Law, Cook County, SAF, SCOTUS, U.S. Supreme Court
