Noir Fires Back at Lawsuit Blaming Glock for Concealability

Second Amendment advocate Colion Noir has come out swinging against a recent lawsuit targeting Glock, calling it a dangerous and absurd attack on gun rights.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to follow and signup for notifications!

Survivors of the 2022 Brooklyn subway attack filed suit against Glock—not because of a malfunction or illegal sale—but simply because Glock advertises its pistols as compact and concealable.

Noir highlighted the absurdity, stating directly: “That’s like suing Ferrari because their cars go too fast.” He explained the lawsuit as a symptom of a culture that “would rather blame the tool than the person pulling the trigger.”

The lawsuit specifically claims Glock intentionally markets guns as easy to conceal, supposedly making them more likely to be used in crimes.

Noir responded sarcastically, emphasizing the irony that the Glock 17—the model cited in the lawsuit—isn’t even particularly compact or easy to conceal compared to other pistols.

Noir noted, “I don’t even like the Glock 17,” precisely because it’s not very concealable.

Drawing a direct comparison, Noir mocked the logic behind the lawsuit, remarking, “It’s like suing Toyota for DUIs because they sell a ton of Camrys.”

He firmly placed responsibility on Frank James—the criminal who carried out the attack—not on Glock or its marketing strategy.

Noir also warned of a deeper issue in New York’s legal approach. Under a controversial law signed by former Governor Cuomo in 2021, gun manufacturers can now be sued for creating a “public nuisance,” a tactic Noir described as intentional legal warfare.

He pointed out an alarming legal paradox: “Did you know the Supreme Court has already ruled that the police aren’t even legally required to protect you?” referencing the landmark 2005 Supreme Court case, Castle Rock v. Gonzalez.

“This lawsuit isn’t about justice or public safety,” Noir explained. “It’s about bankrupting the gun industry one lawsuit at a time.”

He emphasized the troubling implications of circumventing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) by targeting marketing and product design, a strategy aimed at dismantling the Second Amendment by exhausting gun companies financially.

Noir further stressed the absurdity of targeting Glock specifically for designing guns to be concealable. “They’re suing Glock for doing exactly what the gun is supposed to do,” Noir said plainly.

Concealability isn’t a flaw—it’s precisely why law enforcement agencies worldwide trust Glock, and why millions of Americans carry these pistols for personal protection.

Highlighting the slippery slope of such lawsuits, Noir asked rhetorically, “What’s next, suing a knife company because the blade is sharp, suing a ladder company because it’s tall enough to fall off of?”

Noir concluded by underscoring the seriousness behind this legal assault: it’s not about saving lives or seeking justice. It’s about systematically undermining the constitutional right to bear arms.

“This isn’t just nonsense dressed up in legalese,” Noir warned. “It’s a weapon used to dismantle your rights one lawsuit at a time.”

*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***