[[{“value”:”
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to follow and signup for notifications!
The long-standing $200 tax stamp imposed under the National Firearms Act (NFA) on suppressors, short-barreled rifles (SBRs), short-barreled shotguns (SBSs), and “any other weapons” (AOWs) has officially been reduced to zero dollars.
While the NFA itself remains intact, the federal government will no longer collect a tax for the transfer or manufacture of those specific items.
For decades, the NFA tax stamp functioned as a financial barrier layered on top of an already burdensome regulatory process. While $200 may not sound significant today, it was intentionally punitive when enacted in 1934 and has long been criticized as an unconstitutional tax on exercising a fundamental right.
Setting the tax at $0 represents a shift in federal firearms policy, even if it falls short of full NFA repeal.
What Actually Changes and What Does Not
The most immediate and tangible change is simple: there will no longer be a federal tax collected for suppressors, SBRs, SBSs, or AOWs.
That said, it is important to separate tax policy from regulation.
The underlying NFA registration framework remains in place. ATF Form 1 and Form 4 submissions are still required, along with background checks, fingerprints, photographs, and federal approval before possession. In short, the paperwork survives even though the tax does not.
This creates a legal and constitutional oddity. The NFA was upheld for decades on the premise that it was a tax statute. With the tax now set at zero, the government is left enforcing a regulatory regime that arguably no longer aligns with its original justification. The Department of Justice continues to support ongoing registration requirements, but this issue is almost certain to face renewed legal scrutiny.
The ATF Was…Not Ready
If anyone believed the transition to tax-free suppressors would be smooth, the ATF quickly dispelled that notion.
Within hours of the policy taking effect, the ATF’s eForms system buckled under demand. Login errors, timeouts, password rejections, and outright crashes were widely reported by consumers, dealers, and manufacturers alike. For many, submitting paperwork on day one—or day two—was simply impossible.
This was not a surprise surge. The law was signed months in advance. The ATF knew the effective date. It knew suppressors were already one of the fastest-growing segments of the firearms market. It even took the eForms system offline beforehand for “updates” and “upgrades” intended to prepare for increased traffic.
And yet, when the moment arrived, the system folded.
Industry contacts tell TTAG that the sheer volume of submissions overwhelmed the servers almost immediately. Translation: the federal agency responsible for regulating this process apparently did not scale infrastructure for the most predictable demand spike imaginable.
One might reasonably ask how an agency with months to prepare—and near-total control over the process—failed to anticipate that Americans would eagerly exercise a right that had just become cheaper for the first time in 91 years.
Delay by Design or Just Government as Usual?
To be fair, government IT failures are so common they barely register as news anymore. From healthcare portals to unemployment systems to tax filing platforms, federal technology has a long history of collapsing precisely when citizens need it most.
Still, the irony here is hard to miss.
For decades, critics argued that NFA delays were artificial—bureaucratic friction used as a deterrent rather than a necessity. The ATF itself inadvertently reinforced that argument in recent years, approving some suppressor transfers in days, hours, or even minutes when it chose to do so.
Those faster approvals demonstrated something important: the system was never inherently slow. It was slow because it was allowed to be.
Now, with the $200 tax removed and public demand surging, the same system suddenly can’t keep up. Whether that is institutional inertia, poor planning, or simple indifference is an open question. What is not in dispute is that law-abiding gun owners once again paid the price for federal dysfunction—this time in the form of error messages instead of a tax bill.
Progress, Even When It’s Messy
Despite the rocky rollout, approvals began trickling in within 24 hours for some applicants, demonstrating that the system still works when it stays online. Whether those turnaround times remain short or balloon again remains to be seen.
What matters most is the larger trajectory. For the first time since 1934, Americans can acquire suppressors and certain short-barreled firearms without paying a federal tax for permission. The ATF may not have been ready for that reality—but the country clearly was.
If nothing else, the crash served as an unintended confirmation of what gun owners have said for years: remove the artificial barriers, and Americans will exercise their rights in large numbers. The system’s failure to meet that demand says far more about the system than about the people using it.
Which NFA Items Are Still Taxed
Not all NFA-regulated items are affected by the change.
Machine guns and destructive devices remain subject to the $200 federal tax stamp and all existing restrictions. The elimination of the tax on suppressors and short-barreled firearms may ultimately serve as a stepping stone toward future challenges to the remaining categories, but for now, the distinction remains.
Why This Matters
Suppressors are hearing-safety tools that reduce sound and concussion for shooters and those nearby. Their widespread use in Europe and other parts of the world has long underscored how out of step U.S. policy has been on the issue.
Short-barreled rifles and shotguns similarly offer practical advantages in confined spaces, including home defense and vehicle deployment, without presenting any unique public-safety risk compared to their longer-barreled counterparts.
Removing the tax does not eliminate regulation, but it does remove an artificial cost barrier that disproportionately affects law-abiding gun owners while doing nothing to deter criminal misuse.
A Step Forward—Not the End of the Fight
The reduction of the NFA tax stamp to $0 is a significant development, but it does not end the debate over the NFA itself. Many Second Amendment advocates argue that once the tax justification disappears, continued registration and transfer controls become constitutionally suspect.
Several lawmakers, including Rep. Andrew Clyde, have already called on the Department of Justice to reevaluate the NFA in light of the tax elimination. Whether courts ultimately agree remains to be seen, but the NFA’s legal foundation is now weaker than it has been in decades.
The Bottom Line
As of January 1, 2026:
- Suppressors, SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs will carry a $0 federal tax stamp
- ATF approval and registration requirements still apply
- Machine guns and destructive devices remain taxed and restricted
This is not the repeal of the National Firearms Act. But it is a clear acknowledgment—whether intentional or not—that the federal government’s long-standing approach to taxing certain firearms accessories was increasingly indefensible.
For gun owners, it represents real progress. For policymakers and courts, it opens the door to the next chapter in the fight over the NFA’s future.
More on the ATF and NFA from thetruthaboutguns.com
- Why the $200 NFA Tax Stamp Is a Century-Old Trap That Hurts Responsible Gun Owners
- The $0 Tax Stamp Era Is Here—And It’s About to Kill the 16-Inch Rifle
- How the NFA Has Hurt American Suppressor Innovation — And What Could Fix It
- If We Win: What Gun Owners Should Expect After NFA Reform
“}]]
