[[{“value”:”
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to follow and signup for notifications!
Western Australia is marking the one-year anniversary of what officials call the “toughest knife laws in the nation.” Government leaders are celebrating the milestone. Gun owners and civil liberties advocates should be paying attention.
Since December 20, 2024, police in Western Australia have been granted sweeping authority to stop and scan people for knives—without a warrant, without suspicion, and without probable cause. In just twelve months, that power has been exercised more than 102,000 times across the state.
The result, according to the government: 228 edged weapons seized and more than 1,900 criminal charges laid against 1,076 people.
Those numbers are being promoted as proof that the law is working. What they also demonstrate is how quickly “public safety” becomes mass compliance policing when constitutional limits don’t exist.
Under the legislation, the Western Australian Police Force may scan individuals at any time in designated entertainment precincts including Fremantle, Hillarys, Mandurah, Perth-Northbridge, and Scarborough. Refusing to comply is itself a crime.
Anyone found carrying a knife in these areas can face up to three years in prison and fines exceeding $36,000. Even refusing to submit to a scan or failing to produce an item when ordered can result in a year behind bars and a $12,000 fine.
The law does contain a “lawful excuse” provision—but self-defense is explicitly excluded. In other words, carrying a knife to protect yourself is not a defense. Carrying one because your job requires it might be. The distinction is left to police discretion on the street.
The legislation was modeled after Queensland’s “Jack’s Law,” a policy framework adopted after a fatal stabbing and promoted as a life-saving measure. Western Australia’s government has now folded these knife powers into a broader crime agenda that also includes some of the strictest firearm laws in the country and aggressive anti-gang statutes.
Government officials are unapologetic.
Police Minister Reece Whitby stated that the laws are doing “exactly what they were designed to do,” warning that anyone who brings a knife into public spaces should expect to be caught and punished.
Police Commissioner Col Blanch echoed the sentiment, emphasizing that entertainment districts must be “safe for everyone” and that police will continue using these powers to reduce risk.
From a distance, the numbers look small: 228 knives removed after 102,000 scans. From another perspective, they reveal something else entirely—how readily governments will normalize suspicionless searches once the legal barriers are gone.
Why This Should Matter to Americans
What’s happening in Western Australia shouldn’t be dismissed as a foreign curiosity or written off as “that could never happen here.” History shows that it absolutely can—and often does—once the political groundwork is laid.
Governments respond to violence the same way everywhere: they look for fast, visible action that can be sold as decisive leadership. Whether the tool is knife bans, firearm licensing, magazine limits, or “temporary” emergency powers, the playbook is familiar. Expand police authority. Lower the threshold for searches. Redefine compliance as safety. Redefine resistance as guilt.
Australia’s knife laws are a case study in how that process unfolds.
A tragic crime creates public pressure. Politicians promise safety. Civil liberties are reframed as obstacles. And soon, warrantless searches, mandatory compliance, and prison sentences for refusal become normalized—all in the name of preventing the next incident.
That model is watched closely by policymakers in Washington.
The same officials who argue that licensing gun owners is “reasonable,” that registration is “harmless,” or that expanded stop-and-search powers are “commonsense” are paying attention to outcomes abroad. When foreign governments claim success—no matter how thin the data—those claims become talking points in hearings, white papers, and draft legislation inside the Beltway.
The lesson isn’t about knives. It’s about leverage.
Once the state claims authority to search anyone, anywhere, without cause—and punish those who refuse—that authority rarely contracts. It expands. It migrates. And it’s inevitably aimed at the next object deemed dangerous, then the next behavior deemed suspicious.
That’s why gun owners, civil libertarians, and anyone who values due process should watch these developments closely. Not because America is Australia—but because the same people who want more control here are eager to point overseas and say, “See? It works.”
Freedom doesn’t usually vanish in one sweeping law. It’s chipped away through milestones, anniversaries, and press releases celebrating how many people were searched, fined, or jailed “for the greater good.”
And once the public accepts that tradeoff, reversing it becomes nearly impossible.
More on TTAG About Knife Laws & Knife Attacks
- Armed Citizen Stops Michigan Knife Attack
- Florida: Armed Citizen Saves Woman From Knife-Wielding Attacker In Mall Parking Lot
- Following Terror Attack, German Government Pushes Knife Ban
- Another Bad Guy Brings A Knife To A Gunfight
“}]]
